Tungkol sa amin...

My photo
Unit 203, Bldg A, Almanza Metropolis Manila Doctors Village St., Almanza, Las Piñas City, Philippines

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Waiting to see action from Senator Revilla

The Senate Committee on Public Services chaired by Senator Ramon “Bong” Revilla, Jr. called for an inquiry in aid of legislation on May 31, 2011 to exercise its oversight powers of the reported share-swap deal between PLDT and Digitel.

Curiously, in a much-publicized renewal of wedding vows (May 28, 2011) between the Senator and the Honorable Congresswoman Lani Mercado of Bacoor, Cavite, one of their principal sponsors at the nuptials was none other than Manuel V. Pangilinan, current Chairman of the PLDT Group. While we cannot ascertain the depth of the relationship between the Senator and Mr. Pangilinan, we can reasonably presume that the latter’s acceptance of such wedding duties places him in the good favor of Senator Revilla.

Thus, we can only hope and pray that, despite the intertwining of their lives, Senator Revilla and Mr. Pangilinan will not put their relationship in the way of public trust.

When looking into the PLDT-Digitel consolidation, Senator Revilla cannot ignore the threat to fair competition and pro-consumerism wielded by the deal. More important, he should not be pressured and compromised into inaction by personal affinity with the one of the deal’s main proponents.  Senator Revilla, Public Services Committee Chairman must be indubitably impartial, and bear the torch of public service high beyond the shadow of doubt.

Sunday, May 29, 2011

No to TELCO Monopoly!

Merdyer: Kanibalismo ng Negosyo


Nakapanood na ba kayo ng mga palabas sa National Geographic Channel?  O sa Discovery Channel kaya?  Nakita nyo na ba kung paano kainin ng isang leon ang kanyang kapwa?  Kung paano pagtulungang lapain ng mga oranggutan ang kalaban nilang oranggutan din?  Ang tawag sa ganito ay kanibalismo.

Ayon sa mga diksyunaryo, ang kanibalismo ay ang sistema ng pagkain sa kapwa, sa kauri, o sa kalahi. Antropopago. Batayang katangian nito ay ang pagpreserba ng kapangyarihan ng naghahari, at hindi ng gutom lamang. Kadalasang nagaganap ang kanibalismo kapag mataas na mataas ang tensyon sa politika at kapangyarihan ng mga hayop.

Nitong nakaraang mga araw lang, natunghayan nating lahat ang isang kaganapang kanibalismo sa Pilipinas.  Ang pagkain ng higanteng Smart Telecommunications sa Digitel, ang network sa likod ng Sun Cellular.  Isa itong kanibalismo sa negosyo.

Ngunit hindi na bago ang kanibalismo sa negosyo dito sa atin at maging sa buong mundo (naalala nyo ba ang pagkain ng San Miguel sa Magnolia o ang pagkain noon ng Smart sa Piltel?)  Sa totoo lang kasi, ang kalakarang ito ay isang paraan ng pagpapanatili ng kapangyarihan ng isang naghaharing negosyo at pagpapalawak ng saklaw nito.

Pero ano nga ba ang epekto ng kaganapang ito sa atin?  Habang nagpapalawak ng sakop ang Smart Communications, mas gumagaan ba ang halaga ng serbisyo nito sa atin?

Sa ekonomiyang pampolitika, ang kanibalismong ito o merdyer, ay prekursor ng tinatawag nating monopolyo sa negosyo. Ngayong kinain na ng naghaharing negosyo ang potensyal niyang karibal, wala nang sasalungat sa kanya, wala nang maghahamon sa kanya, at kung gayon ay mas malaya na nitong magagawa ang mga corporate plans nitong nakatuon lamang sa pagkamal ng mas malaking kita.

Ibig sabihin, kung totoo mang may mga bagong serbisyo ang Smart sanhi ng pagkain nito sa Sun, ito’y hindi pa nakatuon sa seryosong pagserbisyo sa ating mga subscriber.  Bagkus ay nakadesinyo ang mga bagong serbisyong ito sa pag-engganyo sa mga subscriber na gumastos ng gumastos para magkamal sila ng mas malaking kita.

Ang ganitong katangian ay katangiang monopolistiko.  Isang pagsisikap na makontrol ang pinakamalawak na bahagi ng merkado, at kung gayo’y pagkumpas ng malaya sa magiging galaw ng presyo at sistema ng serbisyo.

Kaya kahit pa sabihin nilang sila ang widest, o nationwidest, asahan pa rin nating mahina ang signal ng SmartBro sa ilang lugar, asahan pa rin nating mapagnanakawan tayo ng load, at asahan pa rin nating eengganyuhin tayo nitong sumali sa kanilang mga elektronikong pasugalan, habang nagkakamal sila ng mas maraming salapi mula sa ating bulsa.

At pag nakumpleto na ang proseso ng kanibalismong ito, bubulagain na tayo ng bagong monopolyo sa larangan ng telekomunikasyon.  At ihanda nyo na ang bulsa nyo.


Ding Loguibis
Kontribyutor

Sunday, May 22, 2011

Malacañang to Look into PLDT-Digitel Merger

Philippine News Daily
April 13, 2011


MANILA, Philippines – Reports said that Malacañang is now in the process of examining possible implication on the set up merger between the rival telecommunication companies PLDT or Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co. and Digitel or Digital Telecommunications Philippines Inc.

Presidential Communications Secretary Ricky Carandang said that President Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino III has ordered his Cabinet economic team to scrutinize the effect of the said merger to the consumers.

Carandang has explained to the media regarding Malacañang’s move towards the said merger:

“The economic team is studying whether we should issue an opinion on the merger… and see what kind of action can be taken by the government if the merger has an impact on consumers. The President has been asking what impact the merger may have. We don’t want to interfere in the private sector but we are concerned if there is an impact. Right now, we do not have a conclusion to that effect yet.”

Among those that will be examined by the cabinet economic team created by the palace include the fear on augmenting subscribers’ yoke from the absence of competition among the service providers like Smart Communications and Sun Cellular, once the two telephone companies finally merged. If finally approved, then subscribers would have no other options but to stick to a sole network regardless of the quality of services offer.

In the meantime, the Php69.2 billion merger fund is still pending in the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC).




If you are against monopoly go to this link and sign the petition: 
Congress Must Investigate PLDT-Digitel Merger Deal

Senator calls for probe into PLDT-Digitel deal

Sunday, May 22, 2011
Sunstar Manila
Jonathan de Santos/Sunnex


SENATOR Joker Arroyo has filed a resolution directing the Senate to look into a business merger that will give two telecommunication companies 70 percent of the telecoms market.


Arroyo has tasked the Senate committee on public services to find out if a “share-swap deal" between Philippine Long Distance Co. (PLDT) and Digitel Mobile Philippines Inc. is in the public interest.


He also wants the committee to see if the PLDT-Digitel merger is consistent with the franchises granted to them by Congress.]


"As a result of PLDT's previous acquisition of Smart, Talk N' Text (Piltel), and Red Mobile (CURE), together with its most recent deal with Sun Cellular (Digitel), it would control 70 percent of the total cellular subscribers while Globe controls the remaining 30 percent," the resolution read.


According to its website, Smart had 45.6 million mobile phone subscribers by December 2010. Digitel's Sun Cellular, on its website, says it has "more than 15 million subscribers."
Arroyo said the PLDT-Digitel deal "could result in a duopoly" between PLDT Digitel and Globe, and that this "raises the question of whether it is to the public good."


In April, Arroyo said the PLDT-Digitel deal will need the approval of Congress because under Digitel's franchise, it cannot "sell nor assign this franchise or the rights and privileges acquired."
The franchise also prohibits it from merging with another company or transferring controlling interest "without prior approval of the Congress of the Philippines."


But Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile has taken a different view.


In April, he said Digitel already has a franchise, as do PLDT and its subsidiary Smart Communications. He said the deal does not change the franchises given to either company.


"The only thing that happened is that Digitel shares were sold [by the Gokongwei group]," he said.


Enrile said Congress granted the franchise to Digitel, not to the Gokongweis.


In March, Senator Ramon Revilla Jr., chairman of the committee on public services, told the National Telecommunications Commission to give the Senate its position on PLDT's acquisition of Digitel.


"While a change of ownership of corporations is usually ordinary business, telecommunications is imbued with public interest and we must ensure that public interest is upheld in this transaction," he said. 



Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Solons fear monopoly to rise from PLDT purchase of Digitel

By Gil C. Cabacungan Jr.
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 00:49:00 03/31/2011


MANILA, Philippines—Lawmakers have cast a wary eye on the purchase by Philippine Long DistanceTelephone Co. of a 51.55 percent share in Digital Communication Philippines Inc., especially on its impact on the lucrative mobile phone business.

“I do not, in principle, object to PLDT’s business expansion knowing the reputation and standards set by its leadership in the corporate world. However, if this purchase is tantamount to killing the competition to the detriment of the whole telecom industry and the consuming public, then I may have some reservations,’’ said Quezon City Rep. Winston Castelo.

On Tuesday, PLDT announced that it was paying P69.2 billion for a majority stake in Digitel which in turn would get a 12.8 percent stake or one board seat in PLDT. The deal is expected to give Smart a commanding 67 percent share of the telecommunications market. The purchase is expected to affect Sun’s low-cost strategy, which has forced Smart and number two player Globe Telecom to cut their margins since it started mobile services in 2003. As of 2010, Sun had 14 million subscribers or a third of PLDT’s 45.6 million cell phone subscribers.

“If this PLDT buyout threatens the economy, puts the interest of the general public in peril, and intimidates an otherwise competitive environment in the telecombusiness, then perhaps it must be evaluated,” said Castelo.

Negros Occidental Rep. Alfredo Benitez said PLDT’s purchase of Digitel – which would combine the number one (Smart) and number three (Sun) mobile phone service providers in the country – has made it more urgent for Congress to pass an anti-trust law to keep markets competitive and prevent the formation of cartels or monopolies that could abuse consumer interest. “We have to rush the enactment of an anti-trust law to determine if the purchase is meant to curtail competition,’’ said Benitez in a text message.

Eastern Samar Rep. Benjamin Evardone was worried that chronic consumer complaints on poor quality of service and the players’ insensitivity to consumer complaints would only worsen with the industry reduced to a two-way from a three-cornered fight. “We hope that the acquisition by Smart of Sun will enhance consumer services even as we have strong reservations and apprehensions that services of telecommunications might deteriorate. As it is, there are already mounting consumer complaints such as overbilling and dropped calls that are not being addressed by the telcos. This should prod the National Telecommunications Commission to intensify its monitoring over the industry players to prevent abuses,’’ said Evardone.

Bayan Muna Rep. Teodoro Casiño expressed concern that Sun Cellular's innovative strategies that helped reduce the cost of services—like unlimited call and text plans and lower rates—would be reversed. “The public has to be wary of potential monopoly practices resulting from this takeover,’’ said Casino.

Castelo said that Congress should look into the terms of the buy-out considering that PLDT practically bought a big market share by “killing a strong competitor.’’

“I still believe that competition, not monopoly, will drive prices in the markets at rates beneficial and affordable to the general public. Government policy is always of the nature of preventing ‘empire building in various market opportunities’ to be virtually dictated by business monopolies,” said Castelo.

Monday, May 16, 2011

SMALL ENTREPRENEURS VS. TELCO GIANT SMART PHILS. INC.



Thousands of small businessmen represented by their association TELCO ENTREPRENEURS ASSOCIATION, INC . stage a picket rally in front of the SMART TOWER at Ayala Avenue , Makati City on Thursday, May 21, 2009.

They are protesting the the telcos summary dismissal of around 30,000 to 50,000 SMART E-LOAD DEALERS AND SUBDEALERS NATIONWIDE.

Many of them have been part of Smarts eload business since its early years but were recently unceremoniously eliminated in favor of a few companies appointed by Smart.

According to Tea, inc. president Robert Galon, the thousands of Smart Phils. dealers and subdealers now fear future of their families as Smart has effectively killed their livelihood. Tea, Inc. hopes that the government would look into their situation and help them. Prompting them to recently publish an open letter to GMA and our legislators to ask for their help.




NAKAKAPAGOD PERO MALUWAG SA DAMDAMIN DAHIL NAIPAHAYAG NAMIN ANG AMING SALOOBIN.


SANA MAKITA ITO NG GOBYERNO DAHIL MARAMI ANG MAGUGUTOM NA PAMILYA.


ANG MGA MAYAYAMAN AY PATULOY NA NAMAMAYAGPAG NGUNI'T ANG MGA MAHIHIRAP LALONG NAGIGING KAWAWA!






Saturday, May 14, 2011

Monopoly 101

What is a monopoly?
Definition:
Etymology: Latin monoplium, from Greek monoplion : mono-, mono- + plein, to sell; see pel-4 in Indo-European roots
Other forms: mo·nopo·lism (Noun), mo·nopo·list (Noun), mo·nopo·listic (Adjective), mo·nopo·listi·cal·ly (Adverb)
Tagalog: monopolyo 
Latin: monopolium
French: monopole
Spanish: monopolio 


In economics, a monopoly  exists when a specific individual or an enterprise has sufficient control over a particular product or service to determine significantly the terms on which other individuals shall have access to it ...
(Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly)

When one business or company dominates its area and squeezes out all its competition, the result is the consumer does not have a free choice, and inevitably the price of it's products or services will increase, and the 'Monopoly' increases it's profit. Although, sometimes prices stay low to discourage anyone from entering the market, profit still does occur. Not to be confused with a puremonopoly, where a company has control over the entire market for a product because of barriers to entry, a monopoly doesn't exist with complete control.

However, a monopoly is a philosophical process of direct competition leading to a puremonopoly, it is not in itself a purely dominating force. It is rather, the process of obtaining competitive grounds for a strive toward total control.
(Source: wiki.answers.com)


A monopoly exists where there is only one supplier of a product or service. This allows the supplier to charge higher prices than if there was competition. There are degrees of monopoly and only the market in a commodity is completely free of monopoly pricing power.

What is usually meant by a monopoly is that there is no competition and therefore the supplier has a very high degree of pricing power. If there is no competition, the product being sold should have a price cross elasticity close to zero with any other product. As prices change, volumes sold follow the demand curve for the market; if prices rise, buyers either pay up or do without rather than switching to another supplier.

A market that falls short of monopoly but which also falls short of perfect competition is described as having monopolistic competition or imperfect competition.

Monopolies can arise in a number of ways including:

Legally enforced monopolies on an entire market.

Patents and copyrights: these create (usually very narrow) legally enforced monopolies on particular products or services.

Natural monopolies: this includes many utilities where the cost of building a distribution network makes building more than one uneconomic.

Cartels: agreements by former competitors to cooperate on pricing or market share; illegal in most countries.

Network effects: these can both help create a monopoly and make it difficult to dislodge once established.

Control of access to a market: e.g. if a retailer can buy up all the best sites for distributing a particular product in a particular area they can choke off the competition's access to customers.

It is clearly beneficial for a suppliers to try to reduce competition to their own products as far as possible, this may through differentiation of their products, building barriers to entry and deliberately exploiting network effects.
(Source: http://moneyterms.co.uk)

Features of a Monopoly

When we discuss a monopoly, or oligopoly, etc. we're discussing the market for a particular type of product, such as toasters or DVD players. In the textbook case of a monopoly, there is only one firm producing the good. In a real world monopoly, such as the operating system monopoly, there is one firm that provides the overwhelming majority of sales (Microsoft), and a handful of small companies that have little or no impact on the dominant firm.

Because there is only one firm (or essentially only one firm) in a monopoly, the monopoly's firm demand curve is identical to the market demand curve, and the monopoly firm need not consider what it's competitors are pricing at. Thus a monopolist will keep selling units so long as the extra amount he receives by selling an extra unit (the marginal revenue) is greater than the additional costs he faces in producing and selling an additional unit (the marginal cost). Thus the monopoly firm will always set their quantity at the level where marginal cost is equal to marginal revenue.

Because of this lack of competition, monopoly firms will make an economic profit. This would normally cause other firms to enter the market. For this market to remain a monopolistic one, there must be some barrier to entry. A few common ones are:

Legal Barriers to Entry - This is a situation where a law prevents other firms from entering the market to sell a product. In the United States, only the USPS can deliver first class mail, so this would be a legal barrier to entry. In many jurisdictions alcohol can only be sold by the government run corporation, creating a legal barrier to entry in this market.

Patents - Patents are a subclass of legal barriers to entry, but they're important enough to be given their own section. A patent gives the inventor of a product a monopoly in producing and selling that product for a limited amount of time. Pfizer, inventors of the drug Viagra, have a patent on the drug, thus Pfizer is the only company that can produce and sell Viagra until the patent runs out. Patents are tools that governments use to promote innovation, as companies should be more willing to create new products if they know they'll have monopoly power over those products.

Natural Barriers to Entry - In these type of monopolies, other firms cannot enter the market because either the startup costs are too high, or the cost structure of the market gives an advantage to the largest firm. Most public utilities would fall into this category. Economists generally refer to these monopolies as natural monopolies.
(Source: http://economics.about.com)